The Austrian art historian Alois Riegl first discussed how past experience shapes our enjoyment of – contempt for, or boredom with – a work of art. In 1900, he introduced the idea, later called the ‘beholder’s share’, that a viewer brings personal meanings to a work, and this interplay makes all art a collaboration between artist and audience. Today, neuroscience shows how our experiences actually shape our perceptions, as the brain uses the past to make sense of the outside world. In this animation, produced for the Future of Storytelling summit in 2018, the UK cognitive and computational neuroscientist Anil Seth discusses how this ‘predictive perception’ is central to our experience of art, and why art that intrigues and engages us tugs at the fringes of past experience.
On the ‘beholder’s share’ – how past experience influences our perception of art
Production: Lazy Chief
Animators: Steve West, Thomas Kilburn
2 October 2018

videoDesign and fashion
Beyond fortune-telling – the enduring beauty and allure of tarot
16 minutes

videoHistory of ideas
How to read ‘The School of Athens’ – a triumph of Renaissance art
25 minutes

videoArt
Finding the spirit of Haiti through a tour of its contemporary art
20 minutes

videoHistory of science
Insect aesthetics – long viewed as pests, in the 16th century bugs became beautiful
8 minutes

videoNature and landscape
After independence, Mexico was in search of identity. These paintings offered a blueprint
15 minutes

videoArt
A young Rockefeller collects art on a fateful journey to New Guinea
7 minutes


