Are observers central to physics, or are they more accurately framed as bystanders to and byproducts of phenomena that exist independently of consciousness? In this interview from the long-running series Closer to Truth, Bernard Carr, an emeritus professor of mathematics and astronomy at Queen Mary University of London, traverses the double-slit experiment, the fine-tuning argument and more to explore what significance, if any, first-person observation holds in the realm of fundamental physics. In his conversation with the US presenter Robert Lawrence Kuhn, he doesn’t adopt a personal stance. Instead, he considers these persistent questions through a contemporary frame, assessing how discussions around them have evolved and where they stand among physicists today.
Are observers fundamental to physics, or simply byproducts of it?
Video by Closer to Truth

videoQuantum theory
Mind-bending new quantum experiments are blurring past, present and future
10 minutes

videoPhysics
Time is fundamental, space is emergent – why physicists are rethinking reality
9 minutes

videoMetaphysics
Can a Tibetan Buddhist and a theoretical physicist find common ground on reality?
82 minutes

videoMetaphysics
Is the question ‘Why is there something instead of nothing?’ even worth asking?
9 minutes

videoHistory of ideas
Splitting the truth: the philosopher that physics forgot
4 minutes

videoMetaphysics
‘The whole thing is a monstrosity!’ How a symmetry heretic sees the Universe
8 minutes

videoMetaphysics
Bertrand Russell wanted to kill off causation. Can contemporary philosophy rescue it?
8 minutes

videoHistory of ideas
From sky charts to atomic clocks, time is a mysterious story that humans keep inventing
8 minutes

videoLogic and probability
Is it more likely you’re a person with a past, or an ephemeral brain in a void?
6 minutes