In this video from the interview series Closer to Truth, the US presenter Robert Lawrence Kuhn and the UK philosopher A C Grayling peel back the layers of a question that’s been bandied about in many a Philosophy 101 classroom – ‘Why is there something instead of nothing?’ With Kuhn defending the question as a legitimate line of enquiry, and Grayling arguing that the question is ‘strictly meaningless, and for that reason unanswerable’, their discussion launches into a compelling exploration of logic and language, and the ways they intertwine.
Is the question ‘Why is there something instead of nothing?’ even worth asking?
Video by Closer to Truth
13 October 2022
videoKnowledge
Why David Deutsch believes good explanations are the antidote to bad philosophy
10 minutes
videoMetaphysics
Why mathematical truths exist with or without minds to consider them
8 minutes
videoThinkers and theories
Henri Bergson on why the existence of things precedes their possibility
3 minutes
videoCosmology
Are observers fundamental to physics, or simply byproducts of it?
10 minutes
videoLogic and probability
Western logic has held contradictions as false for centuries. Is that wrong?
6 minutes
videoMetaphysics
Bertrand Russell wanted to kill off causation. Can contemporary philosophy rescue it?
8 minutes
