In this interview from the long-running series Closer to Truth, the British theoretical physicist and philosopher David Deutsch makes the case that understanding the difference between good and bad explanations is central to advancing knowledge. In conversation with the US presenter Robert Lawrence Kuhn, Deutsch outlines what he believes makes for a convincing explanation – primarily, unprejudiced thinking, relevance and specificity. Further, he argues that this framework for explanations is a vital corrective to a century in which what he calls ‘bad philosophy’, including logical positivism, has dominated, constraining the search for good ideas.
Video by Closer to Truth
video
Childhood and adolescence
‘Do worms cry?’ – and other questions collected from the mind of a curious child
4 minutes
video
Philosophy of mind
‘Am I not at least something?’ A surreal dive into Descartes’s Meditations
3 minutes
video
Metaphysics
What do past, present and future mean to a philosopher of time?
55 minutes
video
Knowledge
Why it takes more than a lifetime to truly understand a single meadow
11 minutes
video
Knowledge
An Indigenous myth and a geological survey elicit two ways of knowing one place
4 minutes
video
Metaphysics
Simple entities in universal harmony – Leibniz’s evocative perspective on reality
4 minutes
video
Ecology and environmental sciences
The ancient Hawaiian myth that sparked a modern ecological breakthrough
10 minutes
video
Thinkers and theories
Henri Bergson on why the existence of things precedes their possibility
3 minutes
video
Metaphysics
Why mathematical truths exist with or without minds to consider them
8 minutes