Simpson’s paradox is a statistical phenomenon in which a trend appears in small data sets, but differs or reverses when those sets are combined into a larger group. One of the most fascinating examples of the paradox comes from a study about gender bias in graduate admissions at the University of California, Berkeley in 1973, when roughly 44 per cent of male applicants were accepted, compared with only 35 per cent of female applicants. These figures appeared to show an obvious bias against women, but when the data were broken down by department, they actually showed a slight bias in favour of women. This animation from MinutePhysics explains just how Simpson’s paradox occurs and, in the case of Berkeley, how the paradox highlighted a deeper societal bias that pushes women towards departments that are more crowded, have less funding, and offer poorer employment opportunities.
How a statistical paradox helps to get to the root of bias in college admissions
Video by MinutePhysics

videoFairness and equality
How can scientific institutions shake their sexist legacies?
7 minutes

videoGender
When aggression is viewed as brilliance, it hurts women in science, and science itself
5 minutes

videoMathematics
How a verbal paradox shattered the notion of total certainty in mathematics
5 minutes

videoLogic and probability
Western logic has held contradictions as false for centuries. Is that wrong?
6 minutes

videoMetaphysics
‘The whole thing is a monstrosity!’ How a symmetry heretic sees the Universe
8 minutes

videoLogic and probability
The unresolved probability paradox that goes to the heart of scientific objectivity
8 minutes

videoMathematics
Correlations can’t imply causation? Not so fast. A primer on causal networks
4 minutes

videoLogic and probability
Is a red apple proof that all ravens are black? A paradox of scientific logic
6 minutes

videoNeurodiversity
Workplace diversity isn’t just about equality – it’s a competitive advantage
4 minutes