Historically, soldiers have been subject to a different set of standards, laws and punishments than civilians, on the assumption that war is an exceptional circumstance. But should soldiers really be treated differently by the law? Because combatant and civilian criminals often face similar pressures and circumstances, the Oxford-based French political philosopher Cécile Fabre believes that there should be no ethical chasm between how society prosecutes ‘acts of unjust aggression’, whether in peacetime or in war. A thought-provoking perspective on justice, this instalment of Aeon’s In Sight series offers a striking argument for changing how the law sees war in the 21st century.
If soldiers act with unjust aggression they are as culpable as civilian criminals
Interviewer: Nigel Warburton
Producer: Kellen Quinn
Editor: Adam D’Arpino
Assistant Editor: Alyssa Pagano

videoMood and emotion
What it’s like to be a sniper in an unpopular war
7 minutes

videoWar and peace
What happens when pacifist soldiers search for peace in a war video game
21 minutes

videoHuman rights and justice
Free speech is vital to human flourishing, but it’s in a decade-long slump
5 minutes

videoThe environment
Clearing the Zone Rouge in France, where First World War debris still poses a threat
15 minutes

videoPolitical philosophy
‘I’m against all forms of oppression’: Simone de Beauvoir, in her own words from 1959
40 minutes

videoInformation and communication
The information age traffics in speed. To adapt to it wisely, we must slow down
5 minutes

videoPolitical philosophy
What are we willing to sacrifice to feel safe?
2 minutes

videoCognition and intelligence
How a ‘periodic table’ of animal intelligence could help to root out human bias
5 minutes

videoHuman rights and justice
Beyond ‘guilty’ or ‘not guilty’ – could a range of verdict options be more just?
9 minutes