For centuries, many Western theologians and philosophers have answered the ‘problem of evil’ – how a benevolent god could allow for pain and suffering – with the argument that, in order for humans to perform good deeds, they must be free to choose between good and evil. In this animation from the Centre for Inquiry UK, the British philosopher Stephen Law considers the inverse scenario: if there were a fully evil, omnipotent god, could we possibly imagine he would allow for good deeds to be performed in the name of freedom to choose evil?
What, if anything, makes an all-good god less absurd than an all-evil one?
Director: Steph Hope

videoPhilosophy of religion
How could a benevolent god allow evil? Is it really just a matter of free will?
2 minutes

videoPhilosophy of religion
How a devout Catholic philosopher approaches the problem of evil
8 minutes

videoPhilosophy of mind
If you knew everything, could you predict anything? A thought experiment
8 minutes

videoPhilosophy of mind
We may never settle the ‘free will’ debate, but tapping into it is still worthwhile
32 minutes

videoEthics
How many monkeys is it worth sacrificing to save a human life?
6 minutes

videoEthics
For Iris Murdoch, selfishness is a fault that can be solved by reframing the world
6 minutes

videoValues and beliefs
What’s your responsibility to a child at risk nearby and to one dying far away?
2 minutes

videoSocial psychology
Don’t misread Darwin: for humans, ‘survival of the fittest’ means being sympathetic
5 minutes

videoPolitical philosophy
Sartre and the existential choice: ‘In fashioning myself, I fashion humanity’
2 minutes