Facts and reason are not enough. If you want to understand politics, look to morals
If there’s one political idea most of us can agree on, it’s that we’re currently living through an age of immense ideological polarisation. Inspired by the hyperpartisan political climate in the US, the experimental social psychologist Peter Ditto at the University of California, Irvine set out to investigate how differing views of morality shape political judgments. Working from what’s known as ‘moral foundations theory’, which uses five categories – harm, fairness, loyalty, tradition and purity – as a framework for moral reasoning, Ditto created a survey website to learn to what extent different moral frameworks shape outlooks on political questions, and indeed the greater world. His findings were compelling, but likely unsurprising if you’ve ever had an irreconcilable political squabble at the dinner table: it’s our moral filters, not facts or rational thinking, that mould our ideological outlooks. You can read more about Ditto’s work at the University of California website.
Video by University of California
Website: Fig. 1

videoEthics
A deathbed scenario raises the question: how much power should a promise hold?
5 minutes

videoHistory
In Stalin’s home city in Georgia, generations clash over his legacy
20 minutes

videoEthics
What’s an idea worth? How prominent thinkers have understood intellectual property
6 minutes

videoThinkers and theories
The prison abolitionist who dares to envision a world without ‘unfreedoms’
16 minutes

videoHistory of science
Meet the Quaker pacifist who shattered British science’s highest glass ceilings
14 minutes

videoMeaning and the good life
Why Orwell urged his readers to celebrate the spring, cynics be damned
11 minutes

videoEthics
Plato saw little value in privacy. How do his ideas hold up in the information age?
5 minutes

videoAnimals and humans
Are zoos and natural history museums born of a desire to understand, or to control?
57 minutes

videoPolitical philosophy
The radical activist couple who fought for social change in the courtroom
21 minutes