Do we have more of a moral obligation to save a child dying a preventable death right in front of us than we do to stop the millions of preventable childhood deaths that occur each year across the globe? After all, a donation to the right charity could very well save a child’s life. According to the contemporary Australian philosopher Peter Singer, saving those directly in front of us while conveniently ignoring suffering in faraway places presents us with a moral problem worth facing and correcting.
What’s your responsibility to a child at risk nearby and to one dying far away?

videoBioethics
Is it ethical to have a second child so that your first might live?
10 minutes

videoEthics
How many monkeys is it worth sacrificing to save a human life?
6 minutes

videoPhilosophy of religion
What, if anything, makes an all-good god less absurd than an all-evil one?
4 minutes

videoEthics
For Iris Murdoch, selfishness is a fault that can be solved by reframing the world
6 minutes

videoBioethics
When, if ever, is selecting a ‘designer baby’ ethical?
5 minutes

videoPhilosophy of mind
Caring for the vulnerable opens gateways to our richest, deepest brain states
7 minutes

videoPhilosophy of religion
How could a benevolent god allow evil? Is it really just a matter of free will?
2 minutes

videoSocial psychology
Don’t misread Darwin: for humans, ‘survival of the fittest’ means being sympathetic
5 minutes

videoChildhood and adolescence
‘I want to take the bullet and save my friends’ – the grim reality of safety drills in US schools
3 minutes