From fitness tracking devices to search engines, it’s easy to think of personalised technologies as convenient shortcuts and useful tools for working towards goals. But, argues James Williams, a doctoral candidate at the Oxford Internet Institute and a former Google employee, the primary aim of personalised tech is to keep users coming back by any means necessary – and often in a way that encourages empty distraction. In this brief animation featuring audio from a 2017 lecture at the RSA (Royal Society for the encouragement of Arts, Manufactures and Commerce) in London, Williams makes the case that the consolidation of the ‘attention economy’ to just a handful of companies is an unprecedented and deeply fraught human experiment – and one that demands active, attentive resistance.
A handful of executives control the ‘attention economy’. Time for attentive resistance
Video by the RSA
Director: Olga Makarchuk
15 September 2020

videoAutomation and robotics
If we are what we do, how can we stay human in an era of automation?
7 minutes

videoAutomation and robotics
Human as a process: What awaits us in the coming age of bio-enhancement?
3 minutes

videoAddiction
Is ‘tech addiction’ really akin to drug addiction? Here’s what the research says
3 minutes

videoFuture of technology
Tech companies shroud their algorithms in secrecy. It’s time to pry open the black box
4 minutes

videoMood and emotion
Things can get much more interesting if we let ourselves feel bored
1 minute

videoTechnology and the self
Adaptive technologies have helped Stephen Hawking, and many more, find their voice
5 minutes


